TMSs 3 and 4 of an ABC1 homologue, gi283948596 (top), aligned with TMSs 3 and 4 of an ABC2 homologue, gi149372921 (bottom), giving a comparison score of 11 S.D, 52.5% similarity and 39% identity. The numbers at the beginning of each line refer to the residue numbers in each of the proteins. TMSs are indicated in red lettering. Vertical lines indicate identities; colons indicate close similarities, and periods indicate more distant similarities. The fact that the TMSs shared are 3 and 4 in both proteins, where 3–4 of ABC2 are the last and first TMSs

of the two repeat sequences, while TMSs 3–4 of ABC1 comprise the central 2 TMS repeat unit, suggested that if these TMSs do exhibit this degree of sequence similarity due to divergent evolution from a common ancestral sequence, ABC2 proteins must have

Evofosfamide nmr preceded ABC1 proteins. However, the shortness of the sequences compared (50 amino acids) renders this conclusion tentative. Regardless, from x-ray CFTRinh-172 solubility dmso crystallographic studies, it is clear that ABC1 and ABC2 proteins do not have a common fold, and therefore have not retained 3-dimensional structural features as expected [6, 7]. To understand why TMSs 3 and 4 of both transporter types proved to show the greatest sequence similarity, the three repeat units in ABC1 porter were examined. The results revealed that sequence divergence of the first and third repeats was greater than that of the central repeat (Table 4). This observation could explain why the central repeats of ABC1 porters were recognized as similar to the potential precursors, TMSs 3 and 4 of ABC2 porters, while the first and third repeats were not. Table 4 Comparisons between TMSs 3 and 4 of Type 1 (ABC1) and Type 2 (ABC2) proteins TC # (ABC2) TC # (ABC1) GAP score in standard deviations 3.A.1.101.1 3.A.1.109.1 12 3.A.1.101.1 3.A.1.212.1 10.6 3.A.1.101.1 3.A.1.206.1 12.5 3.A.1.101.1 3.A.1.113.1 10.8 3.A.1.101.1 3.A.1.208.1 12.6 3.A.1.127.1 3.A.1.106.1 Arachidonate 15-lipoxygenase 11.1 3.A.1.102.1 3.A.1.106.1 12.1 Discussion Essentially all ABC uptake transporters are homologous The results reported in Table 1 (and visualized in Figure 13) provide

statistical evidence that all 35 families of ABC uptake porters, except family 21, contain integral membrane proteins that are homologous to each other. They are believed to have arisen from a 3 TMS precursor which duplicated to give 6 TMS porters, many of which are represented in present day integral membrane uptake and export transport systems. However, although alternative topological variants have arisen (5, 10, 12 and 20 TMSs, and possibly 7, 8 and 9 TMSs as well), we could demonstrate homology using a cut-off point of 10 (or more) S.D. for a stretch of at least 60 continuous amino acyl selleck products residues. Because of the tremendous topological variation, we do not expect all of these proteins to exhibit the same 3-dimensional folds although so far, this has been the case.