The tests for the retrieval of the trained behavior were performed with electric shock if there is no description. Learner fish trained for the original avoidance Ixazomib cell line task were tested for the retrieval of avoidance behavior without electric shock on the next day (average trial numbers for reaching the learning

criterion in avoidance test = 10.4 ± 2.2, n = 6), and then further trained for the stay task after 20 min of rest. In the stay task, fish had to stay in the same compartment for 30 s of cue presentation, and the electric shock was only delivered if fish entered the opposite compartment, with cessation of the electric shock if fish returned to the original compartment. One session of stay task comprised a fixed number of 40 trials. We repeated three sessions with 20 min intersession intervals. In the last training session, fish exhibited more than 80% success in learning the stay task (average success rate in the last stay session = 95% ± 5%, n = 6). We prepared red and

blue LED lamps positioned side-by-side and presented through the same window of the chamber as used in the avoidance and stay task. We prepared two groups of fish. In the first group, the avoidance task was associated with the red LED and the stay task was associated with the blue LED. Within one session of 40 trials, at each trial, the program randomly Autophagy activator selected between the avoidance task and the stay task. Thus, one individual in the first group experienced both the red LED-avoidance and the blue LED-stay task in a random sequence during one session. The total number of trials in one session was programmed to be 20 trials for both tasks. The fish was trained for several sessions (three sessions on the average; n = 8) with 20 min intersession intervals until it reached the learning Edoxaban criterion, i.e., the success rates for both tasks were over 70%. In the second group, the avoidance task was associated with the blue LED and the stay task was associated with the red LED. The conditioning schedule itself was the same as in the first group. The test session was performed 24 hr after the last training, with the electric

shock. Bilateral lesions were made by inserting an insulated tungsten microelectrode (TM33B01, World Precision Instruments) into the target coordinates and applying a current of 30 μA for 8 s. The target area was 0.0102 × [body length] lateral and 0.0224 × [body length] rostral from the habenula, which corresponds to the average of the activity centers of the IP imaging (Figure 3B, n = 7). Spike counts of every 50 ms were summed, and then spike counts of 250 ms bins were normalized with the average of the spike counts over 1 s before cue onset. An increase or decrease in normalized spike activity of each 250 ms bin by more than two SDs was considered as activation or inhibition, respectively. Four bins starting from the onset of cue presentation were analyzed to classify the activity pattern.