’s (unpublished) ITS analysis Species included Type species: Chr

’s (unpublished) ITS analysis. Species included Type species: Chromosera viola. Comments This new, currently monotypic buy S63845 subgenus in Chromosera is erected for C. viola. It was

originally described in Hygrocybe by Geesink & Bas, then transferred to Cuphophyllus by Bon because of the highly interwoven hyphae in the lateral strands of the lamellar context. Gloioxanthomyces Lodge, Vizzini, Ercole & Boertm., gen. PCI-34051 nov. MycoBank MB804073 Type species: Hygrophorus vitellinus Fr., Monogr. Hymenomyc. Suec. (Upsaliae) 2(2): 312 (1863), ≡ Gloioxanthomyces vitellinus (Fr.) Lodge, Vizzini, Ercole & Boertm. Lectotype here designated for Hygrophorus vitellinus Fr. is an illustration cited in Fries, Monogr. Hymenomyc. Suec. (Upsaliae) 2(2): 312 (1863): Icon. t. 167, f. 3. Pileus and stipe yellow or orangish yellow, viscid; lamellae arcuate-decurrent, yellow, with a gelatinized or subgelatinized edge, edged often darker (translucent). Basidiospores ellipsoid this website or subglobose, Q 1.0—1.6, mean Q 1.2—1.3, guttulate in KOH, with a wide hilar appendix, inamyloid, acyanophilic, hyaline, smooth; basidia usually 4-sterigmate, with basal clamp connection occasionally a moderate medallion type, short, 30—40 μm long, ratio of basidia to basidiospore

length 4–5; pileipellis and stipitipellis an ixotrichodermium or ixocutis; trama not dextrinoid; lamellar trama subregular, central strand not differentiated, elements cylindric to subglobose, some subglobose cells highly inflated to 10—30 μm diam., subhymenium

of tightly interwoven small diameter hyphae, not gelatinized except at the lamellar edge; edge gelatinized or subgelatinized; cheilocystidia clavate, simple or slightly lobed. Clamp connections present throughout, occasionally a modest medallion type, not toruloid. It differs from Chromosera subg. Oreocybe in presence of a gelatinized lamellar edge and cheilocystidia, and basidiospores with smaller Q (1.2–1.3 PRKD3 vs. 1.4–1.8) and never constricted. It differs from Chromosera subg. Chromosera in absence of dextrinoid reactions in the context, absence of pigment globules in the pileipellis and lamellar edge gelatinized with cheilocystidia present. It differs from Chromosera subg. Subomphalia in absence of violaceous pigments, viscid rather than dry surfaces, and absence of a central strand in the lamellar trama. Etymology Gloio — glutinous, xantho —yellow, myces — fungus. Gloioxanthomyces vitellinus (Fr.) Lodge, Vizzini, Ercole & Boertm., comb. nov. MycoBank MB804074 Basionym: Hygrophorus vitellinus Fr., Monogr. Hymenomyc. Suec. (Upsaliae) 2(2): 312 (1863), ≡ Gliophorus vitellinus (Fr.) Kovalenko (1988), [=?Hygrocybe luteolaeta Arnolds]. Lectotype for Hygrophorus vitellinus Fr. is an illustration cited by Fries in Monogr. Hymenomyc. Suec. (Upsaliae) 2(2): 312 (1863): Hym. Eur. p. 417, Icon. T. 167, f. 3.

Comments are closed.