Results showed no significant difference between samples with and without CNTs with regard to the particle number concentration. Microscopy samples analyzed by SEM and TEM showed no evidence of CNTs and could not clearly identify individual CNT structures or bundles in the fibers or the particle agglomerates. Emissions resulting from wet cutting

(with water) were not statistically different from background levels, except when the cutting wheel guard was damaged. For the second scenario (low energy processes), similar instruments and PF-01367338 supplier conditions were employed during a study on possible releases of CNTs during wet and dry solid core drilling with the exception of using a cascade impactor/diffusion battery combination to collect a time integrated area learn more sample for metal analysis (Bello et al., 2010). Differences were observed in the solid core drilling when compared to the cutting operations in the size distributions, fiber concentration, particle morphology, and observation of CNT aggregates. Clusters of CNT aggregates were observed by TEM during the core drilling of CNT composites. Lower energy sanding and abrasion of composites containing CNTs have been studied by a number of authors (Cena and Peters, 2011, Golanski et al., 2010, Gupta et al., 2006 and Wohlleben et al., 2011). Manual sanding processes examined differ notably from high speed cutting and drilling and higher energy sanding in that they produce significantly

lower airborne particle concentrations (Gohler et al., 2010). The parameters, which have to be specified for the testing method, are the material of the abrasion wheel, the contact force or the contact pressure, and the peripheral speed. For manual sanding the increase in number concentration was found to be negligible compared

with background levels (Cena and Peters, 2011). Similar results showing limited release from low energy sanding and abrasion were obtained in a study working with CNTs embedded in polyoxymethylene polymer (< 5% by wt) (Wohlleben et al., 2011). An early study reported that CNTs stuck out of larger Resveratrol particles following the mechanical sanding of a 1% CNT in a composite (Gupta et al., 2006). The experiment was conducted within a glove box and no single CNT-fibers were reported as well. Cena and Peters (2011) reported that TEM showed large particles > 300 nm size with CNT protruding, but no free CNTs were observed and noted that the toxicity of epoxy particles containing CNTs is unknown. Another study reported that nanoparticles were emitted, but no isolated CNTs were found (Golanski et al., 2010). The first study to report the presence of free CNTs after abrading CNT-composites has very recently been published; however, no quantitative information is given on the concentration of free CNTs (Schlagenhauf et al., 2012). Weathering of CNTs embedded in polyoxymethylene polymer (< 5% by wt) under intense UV light was studied (Wohlleben et al., 2011).