Regarding the role of the reported plant proteases involved in DON resistance, selleck chem Vorinostat we suggest that they do not act in response to a DON accumulation but rather in re sponse to a Fusarium protease rich environment as Fusar ium proteases appear together with mycotoxins during spike rachis and kernel colonisation. In addition, a specific function within a detoxification mechanism has yet not been described for plant proteases. Conclusions Our transcriptome study provides evidence for the exist ence of a biphasic defence reaction against FHB in wheat. Jasmonate and ethylene regulated non specific antifungal protections are supplemented by host gene networks associated to the accumulation of F. grami nearum derived trichothecenes and subtilisin like pro teases.
Using a literature to transcriptome approach, 26 genes described as related to DON resistance were iden tified due to analogies in their microarray expression profiles which hence, may belong to a detoxification pathway that is active in different resistant wheat culti vars as well as in barley. Our qPCR expression analyses of seven wheat genes associated with the suppression of fungal Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries virulence factors have demonstrated similar FHB responsive inductions in the cultivars Dream and Sumai 3. Moreover, an earlier first induction and a steady state level of expression were found to be associated with FHB resistance, while FHB responsive gene expression in susceptible cultivars was typically late and temporary. These results will help not only to understand changes in overall gene expression in wheat during Fusarium in fection, but will also help to identify potential targets for development of disease control strategies.
In fact, genes interesting for further investigations in this direction were identified in both wheat defence mechanisms. These are, nsLTP, defensin and mJRP genes as well as the PDR transporter gene TaMDR1, the UGT gene HvUGT13248 and the putative serine protease inhibitor gene Ta. 22614. Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries 1. S1 at. The last three genes have shown regulations in response to FHB in the cultivars Dream and Sumai 3. In general, the identifi Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries cation of resistance candidate genes that are commonly active in different resistant wheat and barley cultivars is an important result with regard to the development of novel strategies against FHB severity and grain toxin contamination.
Methods Plant and fungal material, inoculations and sampling Plant material, Four Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries wheat genotypes with contrasting levels of FHB resistance were used in this Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries study, the Ger man cultivar Dream, the British cv. Lynx, the Chinese cv. Sumai 3 and the French cv. Florence Aurore. The winter wheats Dream and Lynx are www.selleckchem.com/products/Cisplatin.html moderately re sistant and susceptible, respectively and inoculated samples were used for both microarray analysis and quantitative real time PCR based expression analysis.