PubMedCrossRef 17 Rodrigue L, Lavoie MC: Comparison of the propo

PubMedCrossRef 17. Rodrigue L, Lavoie MC: Comparison of the proportions of oral bacterial species in BALB/c mice from different suppliers. Lab Anim 1996, 30:108–113.PubMedCrossRef selleck screening library 18. Kunin V, Engelbrektson A, Ochman H, Hugenholtz P: Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates. Environ Microbiol 2010, 12:118–123.PubMedCrossRef 19. Aas JA, Paster BJ, Stokes LN, Olsen I, GF120918 manufacturer Dewhirst FE: Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J Clin Microbiol 2005, 43:5721–5732.PubMedCrossRef 20. Wen

L, Ley RE, Volchkov PY, Stranges PB, Avanesyan L, Stonebraker AC, Hu C, Wong FS, Szot GL, Bluestone JA, Gordon JI, Chervonsky AV: Innate immunity and intestinal GDC-0449 price microbiota in the development of Type 1 diabetes. Nature 2008, 455:1109–1113.PubMedCrossRef 21. Rasiah IA, Wong L, Anderson SA, Sissons CH: Variation in bacterial DGGE patterns from human saliva: over time, between individuals and in corresponding dental plaque microcosms. Arch Oral Biol 2005, 50:779–787.PubMedCrossRef 22. Ximénez-Fyvie LA, Haffajee AD, Socransky SS: Comparison of the microbiota of supra- and subgingival plaque in health and periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 2000, 27:648–657.PubMedCrossRef 23. Chun J, Lee JH, Jung Y, Kim M, Kim S, Kim BK, Lim YW: EzTaxon:

a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007, 57:2259–2261.PubMedCrossRef 24. Paster BJ, Boches SK, Galvin JL, Ericson RE, Lau CN, Levanos VA, Sahasrabudhe A, Dewhirst FE: Bacterial diversity in human subgingival plaque. J Bacteriol 2001, 183:3770–3783.PubMedCrossRef Competing

interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions JC designed bioinformatics, analyzed and interpreted results, and wrote the manuscript. KYK sampled the bacterial gDNA and prepared PCR samples for pyrosequencing. JHL participated in bioinformatic analyses. YC designed the studies, interpreted results, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”
“Background So-called amoeba-resistant bacteria selleck compound are characterized by the ability to survive within free-living amoeba (FLA) trophozoites [1, 2]. Some amoeba-resistant species have been further demonstrated to survive within the amoebal cyst which may act as a “”Trojan horse”" protecting the organisms from adverse environmental conditions [1]. The amoebal cyst is comprised of the nucleus and the cytoplasm embedded into three successive layers, i.e. the endocyst, the clear region and the outer exocyst. Despite the fact that specific location of amoeba-resistant bacteria into the amoebal cyst could modify the outcome of the organisms, precise location of intracystic organisms has not been systematically studied. Most of environmental mycobacteria have been demonstrated to be amoeba-resistant organisms also residing into the amoebal cyst [3] (Table 1).

Comments are closed.