In the absence of knowledge of the mechanisms whereby DEX improve

In the absence of knowledge of the mechanisms whereby DEX improves patient outcome, it will be necessary to postulate testable hypotheses; hypothesis-testing data can provide the basis for designing future comparative Wortmannin efficacy trials for sedation for the wide-range of ICU patients.The ��2 adrenoceptor agonists and benzodiazepines have different molecular targets (��2 adrenoceptors and gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors, respectively) and neural substrates for their hypnotic effects that may play a critical role in maintaining sleep architecture in critically ill patients [22,24]; improved sleep may potentially improve delirium outcomes and immune function [25-27]. In addition, benzodiazepines and ��2 adrenoceptor agonists exert opposing effects on innate immunity, apoptotic injury and mortality in preclinical models of infection [27].

Benzodiazepines increase mortality in animal models of bacterial infection [28-30] likely by impairment of neutrophil [31] and macrophage function [32], whereas GABAA receptor antagonists are under investigation as anti-infective agents [33]. Contrastingly, ��2 adrenoceptor agonists enhance macrophage phagocytosis and bacterial clearance [34-36], while exerting minimal effect on neutrophil function [37], and are associated with improved outcomes in animal models of bacterial sepsis [38]. DEX per se exerts superior anti-inflammatory and organ-protective properties compared with other sedatives [22,39,40] and is neuroprotective in models of hypoxia-ischemia [41] and apoptosis [42], and thus may prevent sepsis-induced brain and other organ injury.

The anti-apoptotic effects of DEX are greater than midazolam [40,42] and may be useful, given Brefeldin_A that sepsis-related mortality has been associated with apoptotic injury [43]. Sympatholysis has also been shown to improve outcome in sepsis [44]; in line with previous reports [22], presumptive evidence for the more profound sympatholytic actions of DEX over its benzodiazepine comparators was suggested by the higher incidence of bradycardia and reduced tachycardia in both the MENDS [21] and SEDCOM [23] studies.Multiple levels of evidence thus converge to support our hypothesis that sedation with DEX may lead to better outcomes for patients with sepsis than benzodiazepine sedation. We therefore conducted an a priori-planned subgroup analysis among patients from the MENDS trial to determine if sedation with DEX compared with LZ in septic and non-septic patients affected clinical outcomes, including duration and prevalence of acute brain dysfunction and 28-day mortality.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>