Design Thirty active, military males (age=25 ± 4 yr, body fat=15 ± 7%), competing for a place on the Army Combatives team participated in a six-week training camp that had supervised physical activity 10 hours weekly. During the six-week training program, subjects were prescribed one of three diets: higher-protein (PRO), traditional low-fat, high-carbohydrate (CHO), or control. The PRO diet was designed to be 40% carbohydrates, 30% protein and 30% fats. The CHO diet was designed to be 65% carbohydrates, 15% protein and 20% fats. The control group participated in all physical activity but was not given any dietary restrictions. Results Thirteen subjects completed the study. Control group consumed 16,489±4,823

kJ daily, 41±10% carbohydrates, 23±2% protein and 33±9% fats. PRO group consumed 8,339±2,173 kJ, 36±10% carbohydrates, 30±10% protein and 35±8% fat. CHO group consumed click here 14,536±6,879 kJ, 58±10% carbohydrates, 17±2% protein

and 26±10% fat. Control group consumed 224±62 kJ/kg body weight with 5±1g carbohydrates/kg body weight, 3±1g protein/kg body weight, and 2±1g fat/kg body weight. PRO group consumed 120±50 kJ/kg body weight with 3±2g carbohydrates/kg body weight, 2±1g protein/kg body weight and 1±0g fat/kg body weight. CHO group consumed 213±122 kJ/kg body weight with 7±3g carbohydrates/kg body weight, 2±1g protein/kg body weight and 2 ± 1g fat/kg body weight. Body weight changes were as follows: CHO group loss 1.1±5.2 kg, PRO group loss 0.2±2.2 kg, and control group gained 1.0±1.0 kg. PRO group had the greatest Nivolumab purchase decrease in percent body fat, followed by CHO group and then control group with -1.2±0.8 kg, -1.1±0.9 kg and -0.6±1.5 kg, respectively. Control and PRO group increased FFM, 1.7±1.2 kg and 0.8±1.5 kg, respectively. CHO group lost -0.2±3.8 kg FFM. PRO and CHO groups lost 1.0±1.0 kg and 1.0±1.8 kg of FM, respectively. Control group lost 0.7±0.7 kg FM. Conclusion It appears that a higher-protein diet can improve FFM

retention during weight loss in non-obese, active individuals. Acknowledgements Thank you to Kelcie Hubach, James Lattimer and Dave Durnil for their assistance during data collection, Kristin Hodges for a critical reading of the manuscript and Allison Teeter for guidance BCKDHB during statistical analysis.”
“Background To investigate the potential effects of three types of protein ingestion in conjunction with a controlled resistance training program utilizing Division III college male football players. Methods 74 NCAA Division III male football players were matched according to weight and randomly assigned in a double blind manner into 4 groups to consume either 40 grams of a whey and casein protein blend (WC) (94.5 ± 21.8 kg, 19.6 ± 2.5 yrs, 180 ± 6 cm, 18.6 ± 8.9 %) , whey protein (WP) (90.4 ± 15.9 kg, 19.6 ± 1.3 yrs, 177.8 ± 6.6 cm, 16.5 ± 6.7 %), casein protein (CC) (107.2 ± 14 kg, 19.7 ± 1.1 yrs, 182 ± 6 cm, 21.6 ± 7 %), or a glucose control (GC) (96.4 ± 18.1 kg, 19.7 ± 1.