(1993). They consisted of a vial (3 L) with the fungus garden connected to a foraging arena and were maintained at 25 ± 2 °C with a relative humidity of 75 ± 5% and a 12:12 light:dark regime. On a daily basis, the ants received fresh leaves of Ligustrum japonicum Thumb, Tecoma stans L., Acalypha wilkesiana Müll Arg and Rosa spp., in addition to clean water. The encapsulation response depends on humoral and cellular

factors, and the cellular defense system is coupled with humoral defense in the melanization Sunitinib in vivo of pathogens. Thus, the encapsulation rate assay provides an accurate measure of immunocompetence, which is defined as the ability to produce an immune response (Ahtiainen et al., 2004 and Rantala and Kortet, 2004). We used three 3-year-old colonies (A, B, and C) for measuring the encapsulation rate of A. subterraneus subterraneus

workers. Three groups of workers of similar size (approximately 2.4 mm of head capsule width) were defined based on their nest location (internal/external) and the extent of actinomycetes covering their cuticle (clearly visible/not visible): (1) external workers without visible bacteria covering the body (EXT), (2) internal workers with bacteria covering the whole body (INB) and (3) internal workers without visible bacteria covering the whole body (INØ). Considering the wide variation Selleck PR 171 in bacterial coverage of the ants, we have chosen two distinct worker classes. INB workers referred to those whose head, thorax and gaster were entirely covered with bacteria from a top view. This pattern corresponds to ‘score 12’ (maximum) established and used by Poulsen et al. (2003a). From a top view, the EXT and INØ workers exhibited no coverage of bacteria on the head, thorax and abdomen. Insertion of an artificial antigen in the hemocoel provokes its encapsulation, and this method has been frequently used to evaluate insect immunity ( de Souza et al., 2009, de Souza et

al., 2008, Fytrou et al., 2006, Lu et al., 2006, Sorvari et al., 2008 and Vainio et al., 2004). We measured the encapsulation response by inserting an inert antigen, a 1.5 mm-long piece of a sterile nylon monofilament (0.12 mm diameter), into each ant’s thorax between the second and third leg pairs. Vasopressin Receptor After introduction of the antigen, the workers were individually placed in glass test tubes. The tubes were maintained in an incubator at 25 °C, 75% RH, in the dark. This procedure was carried out on 10 workers from each colony, with a total of 30 workers for each group. Twenty-four hours later, the implants were removed from the hemocoel and placed on a glass slide to be mounted in Entellan© medium. Nylon monofilament was examined under a light microscope and photographed using a digital camera (Axioskop 40 Zeiss microscope).